Saw this neat video on YouTube about choosing suits for the modern man. Hope you will enjoy it as much as I did!
In an article quoted recently in temasek times, a Nude Model, is now in the limelight as she took nude shots somewhere on an island within Singapore’s territory. She was paid, SGD 1,000 (USD808) to have nude shots of her. Altogether, she is said to have 13 shoots done so far, so that amounts to about SGD 13,000. WoW. So It got me thinking, do women really have it easy?
5) Women cannot be subjected to caning or any form of capital punishment.
Well, firstly, with so much heated debate about female rights and the rights of women and equality. there is still a niche market for female criminals. Did something wrong? well don’t worry our country wont tear your ass like a christmas day present. well it states here, A convicted male criminal who is between the ages of 18 and 50 and has been certified medically fit by a medical officer may be subjected to judicial caning. Perhaps, it does follow the old British/Colonial laws, but really? Why should you cane guys and not women. Where even in the military, where caning is a form of punishment, it only applies to males whom are serving, never the females. Perhaps, just maybe this is because they would not want any sexual harrassment charges. Though if you got a female to cane the shit out of that criminal ass? That to me, seems fair.
4) Women can cry rape.
Hey! Men get raped too, there are female rapists out there whom are just as depraved and psychotic as their male counterparts, it is naturally assumed that just because men are generally physically larger and “stronger” they are able to fend off these female rapists, and in the event that something happens, he “wanted” it. Well. this is where you are wrong, studies have shown that there are a large number of male rape cases that were reported, though, their cases were never taken up to court and even if it did, it often ended unfavourably for the men. It is embarassing enough to say that a woman whooped your ass and made you her bitch, but LOSING the case? because of gender? Man thats messed up.
Men can be, and are, sexually assaulted every day. Any man can be sexually assaulted regardless of their size, strength, appearance, occupation, race or sexual orientation. Male rape can happen at home, work, out doors, in your car, in the military, prisons, in locker rooms, rest rooms, public toilets, in fact just about anywhere a rapist thinks they can get away with it, and it can happen to any male. – Aest.org.uk
3) Women can choose to go dutch.
When a woman says lets go dutch, it either means that she is extremely independant or she just never wants to see you again. In any case, when a woman goes dutch it seems that she is independant and it is somehow viewed in a positive light, where, i.e she has the decency to pay for herself. OH but much less can be said for a man, if a man tries to go dutch, he’s cheap and you should dump him girl! he’s a loser with asijfoai and he can’t pay foo shizz. He’s not going to be marriage material and he is going to make you suffer and live in poverty, DUMP HIM WHILE YOU CAN GIRL! That. Ladies and Gentleman, is simple civic inequality, right there. Sometimes, yes perhaps at that point of time he’s kinda broke and shit, or sometimes he’s really just sick and tired of having to pay for shit he didn’t order, nor shit he didn’t eat.
2) Women are allowed alimony
Women, when going through the process of divorce, often sorrowfully tell the judges, oh, I am used to this, I am used to that. The judge often makes the man pay, to ensure that she is ‘close’ to her usual standard of living. WHY DOES THIS EVEN OCCUR? even if she is the one that is suing for the divorce, even if the reason seems insufficient for a divorce, the woman usually wins and gets the money she wants. What about the man? as Chris Rock said, ‘I’m used to fucking her twice a week’. Would the judge give that to the man as alemony? the answer is no. So the man is left stranded, has to take care of everything inclusive of himself and the woman, who is no longer his wife, and he has to pick up all the slack where she no longer contributes to the household. That my friends is why some people get pre-nups. which brings me on to my next point.
1) Women are always right
If you’re a guy, have you ever tried arguing with your girlfriend/wife/whateverthefuck. You will. And I mean you will, end up losing the argument. Even if you feel you won, you will have lost the argument, as even if you are right as right as the path that the man in the sky walks, you will lose the argument. For the simple reason, she WILL NOT LISTEN TO WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY. When she starts going. ‘Ohhh… Yeah… You’re Right’. She is just saying, ‘Fuck you you are a little kid I am not listening to your stupid words’. So, in essence, forget it! why waste your time getting mad, arguing and spewing shit, just because you feel you are right, if the argument does not get across, then it is no longer an argument, a monologue is a sad fucking situation that happens in plays when the character is trying to decide whether he should die from poison or live a life of misery. Oh and don’t forget, she has control, she will always, always play the card of, NONE FOR YOU TONIGHT HONEY, and you instantly lose, all because you have a pair of balls between your legs.
Well this is a guy i really respect. He chooses to stand by his girlfriend even though the whole world, apparently, even their inner circle of friends have admitted that they knew about the whole prostitute thing since a long time ago. Thats bullocks. Well. I mean I cannot criticize someone for unconditional love. but he’s DENYING it. That is not unconditional anymore, he’s saying that she is innocent and he will stand by her no matter what. Though there is a whole shitload of evidence that matches the web profile of the girl to her “IRL” in real life. LoL.
I feel that she should have atleast been honest about it, and well, maybe if she is really guilty, tell him that she is. It takes a great person to love unconditionally, but it takes an even greater person to deny and go against the masses, It takes the greatest person to lie to a trusted companions face about a matter so serious and try to convince them otherwise. Well I feel, that singapore should have an equivalent of the Jerry Springer show, since we have so many scandals popping up here and there. Well I know the censorship board would not agree with that but really. It’d be nice to watch shit like this get thrashed out on TV. HELL I’D PAY FOR THIS KIND OF SHIT ON TV.
Well all that said, lets assume for a moment that she’s innocent and the whole masses and all the people leaking shit is just wrong and out to burn someone at the stake. Perhaps, Maybe just perhaps we owe an apology to her. Yeah. Possibly, but I don’t think that as a whole it would be very possible for everyone on the internet to apologize to her, if of course there was proof that we were wrong. WE WERE ALL WRONG FROM THE VERY BEGINNING.
Hell I’d apologize if there was an official statement released and I knew that I was wrong. Though. What difference would it make. We’re all just cynnical people waiting to burn someone at the cross anyways. Admit it, you don’t care if this is true or not, you’re just reading it cause its interesting. For the most part, most people are just following the trends and topics, whether or not its true is another part.
That goes to my next point, if the prostitute in question did LIE about her age, and the guys did not check to see if that was her true age, well, that is again a mistake, well and we all know that much of the information that is reposted might be wrong, but we DONT CARE, Just like how the guys DID NOT CARE when they SCREWED an underaged girl. So goodluck and good day here are the photos of her + her boyfriends and some of her friends as well. Taken from Gutteruncensored.com
For the rest of the images, visit http://www.gutteruncensored.com
Referring to: Gutter Uncensored
Pictures and information of the girl in question!
STEPH THIA HWEE KOON (ITE Student)
A.K.A CHANTELLE (Social Escort Name)
Social Escort Agency : http://www.theviemodels.com
The Social Escort Name : Thia Hwee Koon (ITE Chua Chu Kang Student)
The Social Escort Boss : Mr. Teo from http://www.theviemodels.com (deactivated by Police)
Contact no. +65 9864 1388 (deactivated by Police)
Name : Thia Hwee Koon aka Chantelle (social escort name)
Current : ITE Student (ITE Chua Chu Kang) / Social Escort (http://theviemodels.com)
Website: http://mysweetest-love.blogspot.com – Source: Gutteruncensored.com
Pics Gallery of the other social escorts from different agencies :D, Pictures from Gutter Uncensored.com
His views were supported by another fellow MP Halimah Yacob who opined her future should be safe-guarded:
“Everyone deserves a chance to repent. The most important thing is, she should receive proper counseling in the future to prevent her from prostituting herself again.” – Temasek Times.
I will start by saying that I might not be right. I cannot disagree with that statement entirely, everyone deserves a right to repent, though, everyone deserves the right to see “justice” and “fairness” served on a silver platter to those whom CLEARLY demonstrate to the society, their willingness to push others into fire and brimstone as long as they know they will not fall in themselves. This is ludicrous , so now they are arguing for a girl who has chosen to sell her body for quick cash even when she knew full well she was breaking the law by soliciting because she is under 18? Really? Letting her go scott-free will send a clear message to her and to the society at large.
If you are a SYT(Sweet Young Thing), perhaps in need of money for your Gucci Bags and Jimmy Choo’s sell yourself. Really, the law will not fault you for it, because you are minor, plus you are a veblen good just like all the things you wish to buy, the higher your price, the more men want to get between your legs.
I believe that Mr Subhas Anandan is right in requesting for the girl’s identity to be out in the open, she made the decision, with a clear mind, HELL, her pimp even paid her 50 Dollars for a “test drive”. Look at it this way, she is more expensive to test drive than a Ferrari at a showroom, which you could test drive with just a little interest and looking like you actually have money. If you wanted her for an hour, it is 500 dollars, hell, she earns more per hour than some law consultants.
What I am trying to say is, if you look at it in an economic sense, a law degree in Singapore would set you back, about 30,000SGD (approx ~ 20,000USD), by allowing her to go scott-free, the policy-makes, MPs, and the Judicial System itself, would be unconsciously promoting,
START EARLY! BE A PROSTITUTE
- THE LEGAL GREY AREA SHIELDS YOU FROM INCARCERATION IF YOU’RE UNDER 18!
- CONDOMS SHIELD YOU FROM BABIES AND STDS!
- PLUS YOU EARN MORE PER HOUR THAN SOMEONE WHO SPENDS 30,000 DOLLARS ON THEIR DEGREE IN LAW!
- JUST LIE THERE AND SPREAD IT BABY!
- Other Benefits include:
- Starting work Earlier!
- A job that pays you while you’re in BED!
Personally, I feel that this is not something that you would want to put across to the public, even though she “deserves” a second chance, due to her “young and tender age” and her “impressionable teenage mind”. I believe that she represents two poisons of the society, Greed and Decadence. If she had been less greedy, she would not have the motivations to work herself to the point of 4 clients in a SINGLE DAY. If she had less decadence she would do something else, I mean waiting tables for money is still more respectable and less of a thorn in societies flesh. When I was in Integrated programme in Junior College I waited tables at Shangri-La, earning about 50 bucks a night for my efforts, It was tiring but when I collected my payslip I would feel like that money was worth it. I had deserved every single cent of it.
In essence, I urge the people up there in the position of power, to reconsider their stance, and I hope that Mr Subhas Anandan manages to convince the courts!
PHOTOS: 17 year old Polytechnic student cum prostitute with C cups breasts. – Referring to the Temasek Times WordPress Site.
Start by closing your eyes. Set your own intrinsic morals and ethics aside. Next imagine, that you are a man, seeking comfort in perhaps a harlot; a prostitute, but you don’t want just any old prostitute from Geylang(Red-light District in Singapore) You want a Premium one, like a call girl, or a Class-A Slut. You chance upon this great website your friend sent to you, for social-escorts with “special” services.
You look “long and hard” at the photos, no, actually it only took you a second to notice that rack. You see that on the site she provides many different types of sexual services, a wide variety to choose from. Plus the site says she’s 18!
Would you do it? If you said no, you are probably still projecting your own morals and ethics, and not getting the point.
From a purely economic standpoint, she is a Veblen good, her perceived value increases due to her “high” prices, going at SGD450 – 850 per session. She offers variety in her service which is also another strong deciding factor.
THOUGH, no one has thought to distrust a webpage. One of the simplest things around. Well you could say that a large portion of the guys implicated are pretty much impulsive. They probably went with their impulses and solicited the services, even though there might be a chance that she is not what she was advertised to be, at the very least, in the legal respect.
Can you really blame them? I feel that you cannot really put the blame solely on the 44 implicated men. Subhas Anandan, said and i quote, “How is anybody going to know what he is charged for when you don’t know who the girl is, and what her age is? Who are they trying to protect?” Personally, my opinion is that he has made a good point. A girl at whatever age, if she decides to prostitute herself for money, could be considered as in the wrong as well, she cannot be protected simply because she is 17 and still a minor, in the eyes of the Singapore law. So what if she was forced into it you might ask? In that case, then the pimp, or the enforcer, should be the one who should be punished severely for misrepresenting the age of the girl and for forcing her against her free-will.
Again, some of you might say, but it takes two hands to clap, following the idea of “stop buying endangered wild-life products”. Well it does take two hands to clap, but does it really? Trying to solve the problem from that standpoint, puts the responsibility in the SOCIETIES ability to judge right from wrong, and in such a large pool of individuals, there are thousands, perhaps millions of ethical and moral standpoints, each differing from the other with varying degrees. It is like cutting a weed, cut one down and two will grow in its place. Rather, they should focus on severely punishing the PROVIDER of the services, this would serve as a display and as a warning of the moral and ethical standpoint of the society.
I am not saying that the men whom solicited her services should not be punished. Though, I feel they should not be sentenced as heavily as the full penalty, due to the circumstances that there is FRAUDULENT information involved and also, the fact that the sex trade prays on a very delicate place in certain individuals minds, in a place that involves much more impulses and irrational actions.